Excerpts From the Talmud
Researching the slave trade and how it was financed, I was not shocked to discover the Jew. Not one to believe anything I read, especially if it is written by Europeans, I did my own research of the Jew-“ish” peoples and stumbled upon The Talmud, their Holy Book. You can learn a lot about a peoples from their religious literature.
Please take the time to read these excerpts:
“A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition (sex) and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).”
“His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.”
“Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood. Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not; their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.
“Rabba said, It means this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this, it is as if one puts the finger in the eye, but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.
“Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”
“R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal. Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four.
I think I’ll stop there.
I acquired this book via the internet and settled in with a cup of peppermint tea and began reading. After 15 minutes, I threw the book onto the coffee table and went out to get some air. Truthfully, I did not finish it…I couldn’t…my stomach did not permit me to. Over-standing what I have read has given me greater insight for the image degeneracy that plagues the black community via the media. ALL of the networks on tel-lie-vision are Jew-“ish” owned. As are the majority of record labels. As are the majority of literary/publishing/newspaper companies.
And we wonder why the black man/ black woman/ black child is being portrayed as animalistic.